Talk:Japanese destroyer Natsuzuki/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Nominator: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs) 18:14, 26 May 2024 (UTC)

Reviewer: CosXZ (talk · contribs) 19:30, 6 August 2024 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

Stable?

yes Cos ^{(X + Z)} 19:30, 6 August 2024 (UTC)

Image review

The only image is in public domain and is relevant Cos ^{(X + Z)} 23:02, 6 August 2024 (UTC)

Copyvio?

Earwig show a 2.9% so there is no copyvio Cos ^{(X + Z)} 23:10, 6 August 2024 (UTC)

Grammer

@Sturmvogel 66: I have some things I want you to do under this section. Cos ^{(X + Z)} 00:16, 7 August 2024 (UTC)

Lead/Lede

• Mid-year the destroyer was turned over to Great Britain and was scrapped in early 1948. add a comma after "Mid-year".

Design and description

• all good

Construction and career

• One of the second batch of Akizuki-class destroyers authorized in the 1941 Rapid Naval Armaments Program, add "Being" to the start of the sentence and replace "batch" with "batches".
  • Being is fine, but batches doesn't work.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 09:58, 7 August 2024 (UTC)

MOS

Lead/lede

Y Cos ^{(X + Z)} 00:16, 7 August 2024 (UTC)

Layout

Y Cos ^{(X + Z)} 00:16, 7 August 2024 (UTC)

Words to watch

Y Cos ^{(X + Z)} 00:16, 7 August 2024 (UTC)

WP:SHIP guidelines

Y Cos ^{(X + Z)} 00:16, 7 August 2024 (UTC)

Source check

• all citations are styled well
• all citations are reliable
• meets wp:or

Has major aspects and is focused?

yes Cos ^{(X + Z)} 00:16, 7 August 2024 (UTC)

NPOV?

yes Cos ^{(X + Z)} 00:16, 7 August 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for the review. See if my corrections are satisfactory.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 09:59, 7 August 2024 (UTC)

Yes they are Cos ^{(X + Z)} 15:50, 7 August 2024 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.