Talk:Japanese destroyer Kaya (1944)
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Djmaschek in topic GA Review
![]() | Japanese destroyer Kaya (1944) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: November 20, 2020. (Reviewed version). |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Japanese destroyer Kaya (1944) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Japanese destroyer Kaya (1944)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Djmaschek (talk · contribs) 04:03, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
I plan to review this article. Djmaschek (talk) 04:03, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
Review notes below: Djmaschek (talk) 04:54, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
- Well-written = almost (but see comments below)
- Construction and career: paragraph 3: sentence 1: "...renamed Volevoy on the 22nd." Date unclear. If it's 22 July 1947, please say so. My eyes were bouncing between the end of paragraph 2 and the "1949" in the next sentence.
- Infobox reads: "Fate: Scrapped after 1 August 1959". Text reads scrapping order came on 2 September. Shouldn't it say "Scrapped after 2 September 1959"?
- Verifiable = yes.
- Broad = yes.
- Neutral = yes.
- Stable = yes.
- Illustrated = yes.
- Good eyes, thanks for looking this over.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 03:41, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
- Result: GA class. Both of my concerns were addressed. Djmaschek (talk) 20:17, 20 November 2020 (UTC)