Talk:Japanese cruiser Mogami (1934)

Latest comment: 1 year ago by 2A00:23C7:3119:AD01:D1D8:D9D9:FF09:D19 in topic Airgroup

number of aircraft on board edit

Here in the article it is stated that: "Aircraft carried: (initial) 3 x Aichi E13A floatplanes (final) 11 x Aichi E13A floatplanes!" according to "Conways All The Worlds Fighting Ships 1922-1946" page 190, it was planned for 11 aircraft (type not specified) and actually assigned were 6 but hardly ever more than 2 on board! 87.145.85.85 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 12:16, 22 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

final armament edit

Wouldn't final armament be six 203mm (3 x 2) since turrets 4 and 5 were removed to allow more seaplanes? Naaman Brown (talk) 19:26, 9 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

81 SBDs from USS Enterprise and USS Hornet edit

This is an unlikely number given the SBD losses of June 4th and suspiciously identical to the number of fatalities. Enterprise fielded 11 SBDs in that particular strike.

"The attack group was led by Lieutenant SHORT, VS-5, and consisted of 31 SBD's from VB-3, VS-5, VB-6, VS-6; 3 TBD's from VT-6 and 12 F4F-4's from VF-6." Source Scouting Six Action Report: http://www.cv6.org/ship/logs/action19420604-vs6.htm

Jp421 (talk) 02:47, 28 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Collision between Mikuma and Mogami edit

The collision between Mikuma and Mogami seems impossible to reconstruct from the description. It seems Mikuma would have been struck on the starboard side if the rest of the description is correct. Please see the Mikuma talk page. Tupelo the typo fixer (talk) 18:09, 5 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Japanese cruiser Mogami (1934). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:27, 19 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Airgroup edit

The article noted only E13A (Type Zero Reconnaissance Seaplane)s carried by the ship. This was not the case, as she commissioned before the E13A entered service.

Initially, it is clear that she carried at least two Kawanishi E7K (Type 94 Reconnaissance Seaplane)s, as seen in photo on article, possibly three - although there may have been an alternative model carried to make up the balance, since it was not unusual for Japanese cruisers to embark more than one type of seaplane for various reconnaissance and spotting duties. Very possibly a Nakajima E8N (Type 95 Reconnaissance Seaplane) may have been carried at her first commissioning. It is not clear.

The E13A and Mitsubishi F1M (Type Zero Observation Seaplane) were probably shipped as replacements for the earlier models from 1941 on, as they entered service. As both types were seen aboard Mogami in her aircraft cruiser guise (see photo posted on article) and both were given the designation 'Type Zero' (although having different roles), this would account for the confusion which resulted in the article stating that her final airgroup was of 11 E13As. It seems not unlikely that even some E16As may have been assigned to the ship very late in her career, although as stated above, there seems to be a lack of consensus on how many aircraft were actually being carried by the time of Surigao Strait.

This subject probably warrants more research. 2A00:23C7:3119:AD01:D1D8:D9D9:FF09:D19 (talk) 12:53, 1 March 2023 (UTC)Reply