This article is within the scope of WikiProject Podcasting, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of notable podcasts and podcast-related information on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PodcastingWikipedia:WikiProject PodcastingTemplate:WikiProject Podcastingpodcasting articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction articles
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I know the references aren't the most in depth or most reliable sources out there, but I think they're enough to demonstrate notability. For instance, we've got over WP:100WORDS in the each review by the NYT, Tor.com, as well as Lifehacker and I believe all of those are typically consider reliable. In addition to that, we've got more in depth content from Blizzard Watch, Podcast Magazine, and the journalist Wil Williams who has written extensively on fictional podcasts. Add to that the 2019 Audio Verse Awards and I think this pretty handily passes WP:WEBCRIT, WP:NMEDIA, or WP:GNG. TipsyElephant (talk) 14:36, 2 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
