This article was nominated for deletion on 26 November 2015. The result of the discussion was keep.
The contents of the Jyte page were merged into Janrain on 7 April 2021. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article was copy edited by Baffle gab1978, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on December 18, 2015.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
Latest comment: 3 years ago9 comments6 people in discussion
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
Had thought to revitalize Jyte as an article, but notability is limited, so now think this best. Hyperbolick (talk) 03:32, 21 September 2020 (UTC)Reply
?
Support merge, the article's sourcing falls short of GNG. signed, Rosguilltalk 22:21, 3 February 2021 (UTC)Reply
Merge there was consensus to delete at the last AfD, so merge any useful content and redirect. Polyamorph (talk) 21:08, 6 February 2021 (UTC)Reply
Trim the Jyte content down to a couple sentences for the company article, then redirect. So, selective merge. ---Another Believer(Talk) 18:35, 7 February 2021 (UTC)Reply
Merge, but to AboutUs.com, rather than Janrain. The issue is that I went to complete the merge, and only 3 of the current sources are still valid. Two of the 3 are about the transaction from Janrain to About Us, and the third is from the book Internet and Network Economics, which is only about Jyte. I agree that it could go to Janrain, since they developed it. Just thought that it should be discussed before I boldly made a decision. Pinging past participants in the discussion: Hyperbolick, Rosguill, Polyamorph, and Another Believer for further input. Onel5969TT me 13:26, 11 February 2021 (UTC)Reply
Onel5969, I don't feel strongly. I think ideally a couple sentences would be added to both articles appropriately and then this page would be redirected to AboutUs. ---Another Believer(Talk) 16:44, 11 February 2021 (UTC)Reply
Thought about aboutus. But really, they only bought it and shut it down. More significant relationship is Janrain. Would merge most of it, creation by Janrain being established. Hyperbolick (talk) 21:29, 11 February 2021 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
