Talk:Janis Kazocins

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Finlay McWalter in topic Topics the article should explain, but doesn't


Fiachra10003 (talk) 17:11, 19 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Janis Kazocins. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:56, 19 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Topics the article should explain, but doesn't

edit

There's several topics that the article doesn't adequately explain, but I think should :

  • It seems Kazocins is a Latvian name, but it seems he was a British citizen. I'm guessing he was of Latvian ancestry; if so, we should explain that.
  • It seems very unusual for someone to become a naturalised citizen of a country and then immediately to become head of one of its most secret government departments. Surely it's due to his previous relationship with the Latvian government as a liaison from a friendly military, but it's still very unusual and we should explain why. The relevant ref (via Google Translate) appears only to say he is the head of the SEB. Usually when someone takes on a role like that, you'd expect some government announcement with some explanation of who the new appointee is and why they're a good person for the job.
  • The article says he was appointed to the shopping centre collapse inquiry, and then almost immediately resigned. Reading the relevant ref via Google Translate it seems to be due to a disagreement or misunderstanding with the funding of the inquiry or the payment of its board members, but it's not clear.

-- Finlay McWalter··–·Talk 16:38, 26 August 2022 (UTC)Reply