Talk:Janet Kay Jensen
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Janet Kay Jensen article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This page was proposed for deletion by 151.200.237.53 (talk · contribs) on 8 June 2008 with the comment: Article lacks Attribution to Verify WP:BIO or WP:BLP It was seconded by Triwbe (talk · contribs) on 2008-06-08 It was contested by Phil Bridger (talk · contribs) on 2008-06-10 with the comment: there are plenty more reviews of the cookbook found by a Google News search |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
In my opinion, this article either lacks sufficient Attribution that it satisfies the Notability criteria for Biographies, or it may violate the Conflict of interest guideline, or perhaps it is a Copyright violation.
Untitled
editWikipedia articles must be based on reliable sources to verify any claims of notability. Even though the lack of reliable source attribution in an article is not grounds for deletion in itself, an article with absolutely no sources (or only external links to unreliable ones) suggests to some editors that multiple reliable sources may not, in fact, exist.
Although I am considering tagging this article for deletion according to the Deletion policy, I do not have time to examine this article in depth at the moment, and it may improve over time, in which case this warning was premature.
Please respond on this Discussion page, instead of on my Talk page, in order to avoid fragmenting the conversation. — Triwbe (talk) 18:17, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
Recent edits
editI tried to put some lipstick on this pig (like adding {{Cite web}} templates to replace the external links), but some of them were WP:SPAM (links to the LDS bookstore), so I deleted them ... Happy Editing! — 151.200.237.53 (talk · contribs) 23:36, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah, this is gonna need more than the subject's own website as the only reference ... that's a primary source, and Wikipedia articles require multiple reliable secondary sources to satisfy the Wikipedia:Notability (people) criteria. — 151.200.237.53 (talk) 03:54, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
Sorry, but Janet Kay Jensen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) fails both WP:BIO and WP:BK ... please read Links normally to be avoided and External link spamming ... those links you added are for reviews on the websites for online retailers ... you need reviews from multiple independent Reliable sources so as not to violate Conflict of interest ... anywho, that's why I placed a {{Prod}} on it, and then Some Other Editor added a {{Prod-2}} endorsement. — 151.200.237.53 (talk · contribs) 11:45, 9 June 2008 (UTC)