 | This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation articles | |
|
Please show me where this is considered to be the proper style. And where adding additional information like I did, and like you also reverted, is not considered proper style for these things. IMHO detailed disambigs are much, much more useful than the bland link-name-only version. If there is a style page that shows me wrong, very well. But IMHO your style is much less useful than the version I did. There's also the fact that I have been editing many, many of these short disambig pages to be more detailed. If I am doing things wrong, it would be good to know so that I can make adjustments in my editing style. - TexasAndroid 20:24, 15 March 2007 (UTC)Reply
- Actually, finding it myself, the answer appears to be somewhere in the middle. Your comment is right that the full link title should be shown. Wikipedia:Manual of Style (disambiguation pages). I cannot find a line that says it expressly, but all the examples show it your way.
- On the other hand, there is nothing I can see that says that we should not add descriptive comments after the listings. So your reverting of me focused on one thing I did improper, and undid everything else I did that was proper. Very much overkill, IMHO. I will reinstate my change, but will address your concerns. I do wish tht, if in the future you have a problem with only a part of a edit, you do not blindly revert the entire edit, throwing out the good with the bad. - TexasAndroid 20:33, 15 March 2007 (UTC)Reply
