Talk:Jane Franklin

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Alexander1926 in topic Neutral Point of View?

Style of title/disambig edit

Shouldn't the title here simply be "Jane Griffin, Lady Franklin"? i.e. the conventional quasi-noble form; or, maybe, it's not appropriate because Griffin was not her married name....just curious how the current title fits in the styleguide, or whether the old-style comma-title should be the case....Skookum1 (talk) 20:00, 11 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Portrait painter edit

The painter seems to have been [Amelie Munier-Romilly, who has a French page but not yet an English one. I think Amelie is connected to Jane's amour Peter Mark Roget. (Amelie was born Romilly, and so was his mother.) Carbon Caryatid (talk) 14:14, 17 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Neutral Point of View? edit

I draw attention to the sentence in the section, "After the disappearance of her husband," where one paragraph concludes with the bald sentence, "Lady Franklin was openly racist against Inuit." This change was apparently made by the user Sulosky (appears to be inactive now) on 14 October 2019.

The controversy over Dr John Rae's 1854 report of testimony from Inuit of some of Sir John Franklin's survivng crew members apparently resorting to cannibalism, and the reaction of Lady Jane to it, does not need repeating here. But if we are to characterize Jane Franklin's views, there are ways in which to do so that respect Wikipedia guidelines on neutral language - and this sentence really does not qualify. To quote Wiki: "Prefer nonjudgmental language. A neutral point of view neither sympathizes with nor disparages its subject (or what reliable sources say about the subject), although this must sometimes be balanced against clarity. Present opinions and conflicting findings in a disinterested tone. Do not editorialize. When editorial bias towards one particular point of view can be detected the article needs to be fixed." Quote her directly, if necessary, on the subject. We can do better than this. Alexander1926 (talk) 22:10, 22 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Jane Franklin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:30, 22 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Jane Franklin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:00, 23 December 2017 (UTC)Reply