Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

edit

  This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Pnguyen792.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 01:03, 17 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Cleanup

edit
  • Bold should only be used in the lead for the name, not throughout the main text.
  • There is editorialisation which is not appropriate, such as this text under the image Winter Windows: "Like a bone-chilling blast of wind, an icy second canvas cuts through jagged gashes in the ashen, bloody surface of the forward canvas."
  • Here is another example of editorial comment, i.e. WP:OR: "In much of her output before the late 1960s, Frank seems less interested in color than in tonality and texture, often employing the gray scale to create a sense of depth or of motion from light to dark, this frequently moving in a diagonal (as in "Winter's End", 1958), and otherwise employing one basic hue (as with the earthy reds in "Plum Point", 1964). However, the later, "windowed" paintings show a sharper interest in vivid color relationships, "
  • The lead should be a summary of the article, and is too short at the moment.

Ty 18:52, 24 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Have a look at some featured articles for good models. Ty 19:29, 17 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
In the section titled, "Discussion of Jane Frank's work" there are a lot of quotes. Perhaps these quotes (with citations) could be moved to the wikiquote? Jooojay (talk) 03:18, 4 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

File:Jane Frank Sculpture New Moon.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

edit
 

An image used in this article, File:Jane Frank Sculpture New Moon.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 3 December 2011

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 07:58, 3 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Jane Frank Portrait .jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

edit
 

An image used in this article, File:Jane Frank Portrait .jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 3 December 2011

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 08:53, 3 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Jane Frank-Ledge Of Light .jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

edit
 

An image used in this article, File:Jane Frank-Ledge Of Light .jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 3 December 2011

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 08:53, 3 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Jane Frank AprilScreenDetail.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

edit
 

An image used in this article, File:Jane Frank AprilScreenDetail.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 3 December 2011

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 08:53, 3 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Jane Frank NightLandingSambura.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

edit
 

An image used in this article, File:Jane Frank NightLandingSambura.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 3 December 2011

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 08:53, 3 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Jane Frank AerialViewNo1.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

edit
 

An image used in this article, File:Jane Frank AerialViewNo1.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 3 December 2011

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 08:53, 3 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jane Frank. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:29, 22 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Citation style

edit

I noticed someone had tagged this article for unclear citation style in May 2013, and I agree with this tagging. It is hard to read this article because of the lack of inline citations and the confusing style, see Wikipedia:Citing sources. Jooojay (talk) 09:06, 3 January 2019 (UTC)Reply