Talk:Jan Wilkens

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Dont bullshit people

edit

Dear friends

I have nothing against pro wrestling its entertaining to watch. What i have against this is the fact that you make heroes about people and even publish their so called championship record. All grapplers like myselt knows that this is only a show.(Pre Planned) You cannot call Jan Wilkens A champion.Their is no such thing as a record for pro wrestlers amateur yes. The right thing to do would be to erase all this bullshit about his so called record and this counts for all of them. You guys are making real champs look stupid by creating something thats not true. Stop lying to the poor people who believe this rubbish. THEIR IS NO SUCH THING LIKE A CHAMPION PRO WRESTLER. YES HE WAS A CHAMPION SHOWMAN and so is most of them. Love you oom Jan.

Tertius Esterhuysen(African judo champion 1992)a real one — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.215.145.1 (talk) 22:32, 14 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Dag oom Jan en Tertius. Dit het min daarmee ter make of rofstoei eg is of nie; WP weergee maar die rekord soos dit staan. Mooi bly albei! (In case of interested parties being unable to translate: "G'day Uncle John and Tertius. It has little to do with whether wrestling is genuine or not; WP simply reflects the record as it stands. Stay well both!") JonRichfield (talk) 08:30, 17 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Too many dates can be bad for wrestlers

edit

There are two dates for JW; reborn is OK, but this is ridiculous! Could someone please sort this out? In the text he was born in 1943 (sounds OK) and in the box they say 1931 (which seems unlikely.) JonRichfield (talk) 07:57, 17 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Jan Wilkens. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:39, 18 April 2017 (UTC)Reply