Talk:Jamnabai Narsee School

Latest comment: 1 year ago by 2405:201:800B:6079:F070:ECB2:83C0:1113 in topic Unsourced content removal

Notable Alumni edit

Dev Raiyani - Vlogger and Hot Hunk 117.230.168.177 (talk) 03:50, 17 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Start a draft at Draft:Dev Raiyani first. WP:LISTPEOPLE requires a Wiki article be written for a person before they can be included in a notable list. Jalen Folf (talk) 05:48, 17 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Unsourced content removal edit

I have removed unsourced content, and as a result, a few editors are desperately reverting my edit. In the edit summary, I provided a proper explanation why I removed that unsourced content. My philosophy is pretty simple: either provide reliable sources, or they will be challenged and removed. Read the WP:REFB and WP:CHEWINGGUM policies thoroughly. Nobody is stopping you from adding reliable sources, but you can't keep unsourced content. Thanks 2405:201:800B:6079:B51B:2456:FE74:FBCE (talk) 05:01, 14 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

hi, and thanks for helping us edit Wikipedia.
sometimes, you know, it's less time consuming for everyone if you locate the source, given most content in the encyclopedia is accurate and just needs attention to detail.
oftentimes, content removal that isn't contentious should be discussed and a consensus found, in the spirit of collaborative editing.
i think it might help if we go over your edits with you, and suggest changes.
some may disagree,
Saintstephen000 (talk) Saintstephen000 (talk) 05:21, 14 April 2023 (UTC)Reply
I don't have so much time on my hands to find sources for unsourced content; I am busy in my personal life. And who said that most unsourced content is all genuine information? It is the source that will speak. The credibility of an article will be established when you provide reliable sources. But if unsourced content is there, then I shall challenge and remove it. And by the way, I am not stopping someone from adding sources. But you can't keep such a large chunk of materials completely unsourced, denying viewers of Wikipedia the chance to get correct and genuine information. Thanks--2405:201:800B:6079:F070:ECB2:83C0:1113 (talk) 06:58, 14 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

no worries fellow Wikipedia editor, thanks for committing to creating a better encyclopedia.

some of your statements regarding your intent run counter to usual best editing practices, so we'll just tag along and help you learn. have a wikipedia day! Saintstephen000 (talk)