Talk:James v. Meow Media
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 7 October 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was merge to Heath High School shooting. |
| This article was nominated for deletion on 18:14, 24 February 2006. The result of the discussion was KEEP. |
Articles for Deletion debate edit
This article survived an Articles for Deletion debate. The discussion can be found here. -Splashtalk 19:19, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
Liability edit
This article isn't particularly clear. I would presume that they were suggesting Meow Media etc share some liability not are solely liable. In other words, they aren't suggesting James isn't liable but that multiple parties are liable. But the article doesn't really convey this. I think this is important since these sort of things tend to be potrayed as if the people are saying James (or whoever) isn't liable when often this isn't the case. I still regard it as ridiculous as I'm sure to many others but it is important we make the distinction Nil Einne 11:16, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
Meow Media? edit
The article doesn't mention Meow Media. From what I can gather, they're the owner of a pornography site but this isn't clear from here. Nil Einne 14:47, 16 July 2007 (UTC)