Talk:James the Deacon/GA1

Latest comment: 15 years ago by Jimfbleak in topic GA Review

GA Review edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

OK, next up. I’ve made these changes including a switch to BE (centered to centred)

fixed
fixed
fixed
Fixed
  • previous to Edwin'sprior to ?
fixed
  • for celebrated Easter – something missing here
fixed (it was a missing "he"
  • after this – perhaps after the synod?
fixed
  • Why are there two days list for this saint, especially when the October date appears to be unsourced?
Samuel fixed this. It's two different days for two different denominations.

No real problems jimfbleak (talk) 10:03, 15 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Think I got them all! Ealdgyth - Talk 14:38, 15 March 2009 (UTC)Reply
  1. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  2. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  3. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  4. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:  
  5. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  6. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

Keep them coming! jimfbleak (talk) 16:38, 15 March 2009 (UTC)Reply