Talk:James Walker (Australian politician)

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Good articleJames Walker (Australian politician) has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 26, 2012Good article nomineeListed

GA Review edit

This review is transcluded from Talk:James Walker (Australian politician)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Dana boomer (talk · contribs) 19:22, 25 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hi! I'll be reviewing this article for GA status, and should have my full review up shortly. Dana boomer (talk) 19:22, 25 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
    • Done.
    • Early life and career, "In 1867 he was transferred to Toowoomba, which he managed" - Was he managing the town, or the bank branch in the town?
    • Yeah, the bank. Fixed.
    • Federation, "The second session of the Convention," This sentence gets a bit long and confusing - possibly would be better split into two?
    • Done.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

Overall, this is a very nice little article. A few prose niggles that I would like to see corrected, but once those are finished, the article should be good to go for GA status. Dana boomer (talk) 21:44, 25 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the review! I think I've addressed the issues. Frickeg (talk) 23:35, 25 October 2012 (UTC)Reply
OK, everything looks good, so I'm passing the article to GA status. Nice work! Dana boomer (talk) 15:22, 26 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on James Walker (Australian politician). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:04, 18 April 2017 (UTC)Reply