Talk:James Hurt
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was nominated for deletion on 24 March 2012 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
License tagging for File:James Hurt.jpg
editThanks for uploading File:James Hurt.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.
For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 02:05, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
Proposed move
editLooks like to me that this article is about James Maurice Hurt, Jr., which is all right with me, but that, I think, should be the title of the article, not Sumunumus, for which name I see no explanation. Comments? I'll leave the move to a more experienced editor, as the issue of citations hasn't been addressed, either, and without them, deletion looks like a strong probability. There's a lot of interesting information here, though. I've had the opportunity to meet a few of the people mentioned, and hear them play, and if this cat plays with them, he's the real deal. 69.171.187.71 (talk) 23:46, 31 January 2012 (UTC), the Ragityman
- I made a start on the copy edits and stylistic changes needed, and was almost insvantly reverted. My time is too valuable, to me at least, for edit-warring. I'll leave this one to an admin.
- 69.171.178.74 (talk) 01:14, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
Revisit
editThis article looks to be autbiographical, which is also all right with me, but probably won't meet NPOV standards. I like the abundant background information. However, if you create an article on Wikipedia, you MUST be willing to allow editing. This article no longer belongs to you, once you hit "save."
As an orhan, this article draws little attention, which allows it to continue in its unencyclopedic state. But, if no one sees it, what purpose does it serve? Please allow editing of "your" article, or remove it yourself. There are other wikis where an untouchable autobiography might be welcome. This is a village-created encyclopedia.
I hope you decide to join the community and keep "your" article up-to-date. Who better, and, personally, I'd like to follow your progress. 69.171.178.93 (talk) 22:50, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
- If nothing else, please clarify "between years 1998 and 1990." I'd fix it myself, but not sure what you intended.
- 69.171.178.15 (talk) 23:11, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
- I had a look at the edit history. You seem to have made two edits [1] and [2] and neither of them were reverted. Voceditenore (talk) 06:48, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
Sourcing and notability
editThis article is in dire need of reliable sources to demonstrate notability through substantial coverage or notability through other applicable criteria. Reliable sources should be cited inline to indicate the facts they support. Material in living persons' biographies must be sourced. Unsourced claims should be removed from encyclopedic biographies, especially when they present undue weight or are otherwise contentious. Below are some links that might lead to reliable sources to demonstrate notability, if any:
Happy editing! JFHJr (㊟) 04:21, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
- I PRODed this article, but that was contested by an editor who found "reliable sources" that are clearly not substantially about the subject, except for an interview, which can never serve as a yardstick for notability. I removed the unsourced autobiographical drivel because it was overly promotional, quite WP:UNDUE (chronicling high school and college achievements not covered by anyone anywhere), and involved claims about living and dead third parties. If anyone has comments about this WP:BLP related edit, please feel free to leave a note here or at WP:BLPN (right now, the relevant thread remains active). Cheers! JFHJr (㊟) 23:29, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on James Hurt. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131029220316/http://www.newschool.edu/jazz/private-faculty/ to http://www.newschool.edu/jazz/private-faculty/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:27, 20 November 2017 (UTC)