Talk:James Hadley Chase

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Reader feedback edit

  • i m not a inborn english i have read 3 novels of james hadely chase , its too much difficult to read his novels for me .is there any way i can get difficult words & slangs meaning in the novel. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.59.80.60 (talkcontribs) 31 August 2006
  • James Hadley Chase is an author for people wanting to develop reading habits . Specially for youngsters . His books retain the reader interest and make them finish reading the book —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.92.132.117 (talkcontribs) 19 March 2007

hey i am a great fan of james hadley chase!!! his work is truly utsatndin havin a gr8 mix of thrill, romance and adventure!!!

m a great fan of chase...especially "just another sucker" is my all-time favourite...!didn know whether to laugh or cry!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.193.46.49 (talk) 04:36, 30 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

He Wont [sic] Need It Now edit

If that misspelling is correct, then perhaps it could be marked as such. Varlaam (talk) 19:01, 17 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Individual novel articles edit

It's been suggested that Like A Hole In The Head is not sufficiently notable for its own article. The same might be true of Chase's other novels – should they really be linked as they are here, encouraging editors to create new articles? Skomorokh 09:01, 29 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Oppose: Chase is an internationally acclaimed thriller novelist and almost all his novels have significant international readership and is sufficiently notable for its own article. I have improved the article (as well as the other Chase novels that have individual articles) a bit. Moreover how can the plot summary and all be merged to the author's career section? -- Arfaz (talk) 14:28, 29 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Need specific claims of notability for this specific book, supported by cites to reliable sources. Unless the book was on a major best-seller list, critically reviewed in major literary publications, etc., I supportmerger. DMacks (talk) 14:28, 10 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:NoOrchidsForMissBlandishF.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion edit

 

An image used in this article, File:NoOrchidsForMissBlandishF.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 3 December 2011

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 12:29, 3 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

The World in My Pocket edit

This is a 1959 tale of an armored car heist in Las Vegas. It was filmed in Germany as "An einem Freitag um halb zwölf" 1961 with Rod Steiger. It was made into a Soviet TV mini series "Mirage" (Mirazh) 1983 (There is a 2008 Russian film Mirazh no relation.) Its a good plot, Chase trick ending, and all, but.... the About the Author note for the novel includes: "Although Chase set many of his books in America, he never lived there, instead deriving his knowledge from encyclopaedias, detailed maps, and a slang dictionary." Some Russian reviewers cited the 1983 Soviet TV version as showing a true picture of life in America. The few American reviewers found the Soviet movie rolling in the floor laughable. I think this should be a warning to all aspiring authors: library research can only take you so far: it is no substitute for real life experience. --Naaman Brown (talk) 03:42, 29 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on James Hadley Chase. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:41, 6 January 2018 (UTC)Reply