Talk:James Gillingham
Latest comment: 5 years ago by Phil Bridger in topic Contested deletion
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Contested deletion edit
Delete it then, trim the fat, be pedantic and be proud of how efficient you're viewing yourself. there are more sources for information than Wikipedia and if you were a good admin you would add more information not delete things that are not in your field of interest. I can google this guy and discover plenty enough so anyone else can create this page later anyway so enjoy the waste of time.
Contested deletion edit
no like no joke delete it im too busy to work on this i expected to nudge this into existence not justify his existence — Preceding unsigned comment added by Filthy Peasant (talk • contribs) 04:42, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
- WP:BURDEN: "All content must be verifiable. The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material, and is satisfied by providing an inline citation to a reliable source that directly supports the contribution." --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 05:23, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
- But that doesn't mean that the article qualifies for speedy deletion, or that more experienced editors shouldn't help out by citing readily available sources. Are you here to help build this encyclopedia, or just to mark other people's work? Phil Bridger (talk) 19:41, 4 April 2019 (UTC)