This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
A fact from James Edward Edmonds appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 6 November 2004. The text of the entry was as follows:
Latest comment: 4 months ago3 comments2 people in discussion
@ActivelyDisinterested: Apols I saw this "Harv warning: There is no link pointing to this citation. The anchor is named CITEREFGazette33390" and assumed it was obsolete. Regards Keith-264 (talk) 22:54, 11 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
It's an oddity of how the cite has been constructed. If you look there are two cites, a {{cite news}} and a {{London Gazette}} template directly afterwards. They relate to pages 3845 and 3846 respectfully. I've no idea why it's been setup that way. The script you're using sees the second template and beleives it's not in use, because the first template is being linked and the second one is just to link a second page. -- LCU ActivelyDisinterested«@» °∆t° 23:16, 11 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Yes, there's a way round it but I've forgotten how. Regards Keith-264 (talk) 23:28, 11 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
.svg)
