Talk:James C. Hormel

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Copyrighted material

edit

I removed material from his ambassadorship due to copyright violations (it was copy-pasted from the here on glbtq.com). Please do not restore the material but instead write a passage using the reliable non-opinion sources. I have saved them here:

  • <ref name="Human Events">{{cite web | title= Human Events | publisher=New York Times | date=16 July 1999 | url =http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3827/is_199907/ai_n8874620?lstpn=article_results&lstpc=search&lstpr=external&lstprs=other&lstwid=1&lstwn=search_results&lstwp=body_middle| accessdate=2008-07-07}}</ref>
  • <ref name="Hormel's partner">{{cite web | last = Holland | first =Judy | title= Hormel's partner sees win for minorities; Mainstream America rejected anti-gay comments, Timothy Wu says | publisher=The San Francisco Examiner | date=1 July 1999 | url =http://www.princeton.edu/pr/news/99/c/0707.htm | accessdate=2008-07-07}}</ref>
  • <ref name="Queers in History">{{cite web | last = Stern | first =Keith | title= Queers in History | publisher=Lulu.com, ISBN:1847283489 | date=2006 | url=http://books.google.com/books?id=zVKCL0xKTOAC | accessdate=2008-07-07}}</ref>
  • <ref name="Floor Statement">{{cite web | last =Leahy | first =Patrick | title=Floor Statement on the Nomination of John Ashcroft to the Office of Attorney General | publisher=Senator Patrick Leahy | date=29 January 2001 | url =http://leahy.senate.gov/press/200101/010129ex.html | accessdate=2008-07-07}}</ref>

Simply appending them does not undo a copyright violation. Thank you. Hekerui (talk) 08:36, 6 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Just FYI, glbtq.com is hardly an opinion source. Thank you for citing the copyvio original material though. -- Banjeboi 17:51, 6 April 2009 (UTC)Reply
With opinion I meant the Frank Rich column, which you put back in. Hekerui (talk) 18:17, 6 April 2009 (UTC)Reply
OK, in looking at that source it is an opinion peice from the New York Times which is otherwise a reliable source. It is being used to source that Wu was Hormel's partner and held the Bible, etc. The sentences are - The next afternoon, the first openly gay American Ambassador, James Hormel, was sworn in as our envoy to Luxembourg, with his partner, Timothy Wu, holding the Bible. I think this is well within acceptable uses of an opinion piece. -- Banjeboi 19:58, 6 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Life partner?

edit

The "Personal life" section describes Michael P. Nguyen as Hormel's "life partner." Since Hormel is 77 years old, has had a wife and at least two other male partners before living with Mr. Nguyen for only the past four years, wouldn't it make more sense to call Mr Nguyen Hormel's "present partner" or "current partner"? Badmintonhist (talk) 21:00, 5 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

umm... "life partner" is the equivalent of "committed relationship" (and often "married") in places and times where gays are not permitted to marry. --166.205.139.35 (talk) 17:28, 21 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Conflict of interest edits

edit
In recent months material in this biographical article has been removed by (apparently) the article's subject. The removal of pertinent and reliably sourced material by an article's subject, it seems to me, is a clear violation of WP:Conflict of Interest. Therefore, I am restoring the most recent deletion involving the swearing-in ceremony for Mr. Hormel's ambassadorship. Badmintonhist (talk) 19:20, 31 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

GLBTQ.com

edit

Firstly, every external article must be cited to the author of the piece, not merely the site. Citing only to a site name, gives a false authority to the work. The particular author of that external piece is a non-notable author, not previously published by any third-party publication, and not notable as an authority for biography. So in accordance with our criteria for reliable sources, I have removed the link.Wjhonson (talk) 22:37, 2 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on James Hormel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:08, 18 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on James Hormel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:27, 24 May 2017 (UTC)Reply