Talk:Jaisalmer Fort

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Jaisalmer Fort. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110516181540/http://www.wmf.org/sites/default/files/wmf_article/pg_22-25_jaisalmer.pdf to http://www.wmf.org/sites/default/files/wmf_article/pg_22-25_jaisalmer.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110516174854/http://www.wmf.org/sites/default/files/wmf_publication/Jaisalmer_Fort_Third_Technical_Mission_Identification_of_a_Pilot_Project.pdf to http://www.wmf.org/sites/default/files/wmf_publication/Jaisalmer_Fort_Third_Technical_Mission_Identification_of_a_Pilot_Project.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110516180338/http://www.wmf.org/sites/default/files/wmf_publication/Restoration_of_Jaisalmer_Fort_Assessment_of_Outer_Fort_Walls.pdf to http://www.wmf.org/sites/default/files/wmf_publication/Restoration_of_Jaisalmer_Fort_Assessment_of_Outer_Fort_Walls.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:57, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

Regarding gallery

@Yamaguchi先生: Hey! You seem to be removing the image gallery for some reason. Can you explain why you think the gallery of images is indiscriminate? IMO the images should be left alone, wanted to ask why you feel like it doesn't fit in the article. --ShellPandey (talk) 06:06, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

Hello ShellPandey, thank you for the ping. There are currently 5 images placed adjacent to the article text, 1 additional in the infobox, plus 12 images presented in a gallery format. Generally speaking, Wikipedia is not an image repository (WP:NOTGALLERY), and galleries should not be used as a device to shoehorn images into an article. Some of these images are repetitive and provide little in the way of context. Would it not be feasible to relocate surplus images to Commons repository, where it would make sense to present these same images? Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 23:49, 7 July 2021 (UTC)