Talk:Jagdgeschwader 2/Archive 1

Archive 1

The World War I JG 2

Is or isn't there a historical connection between the two JG 2s?

Georgejdorner (talk) 16:33, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Jagdgeschwader 2/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Article seems to be well arranged and researched in terms of WWII but lacks totally the history of WWI and founding history.--Panth 12:54, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Last edited at 12:54, 25 June 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 19:22, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Recent edit

Preserving the material here by providing this link; pls see edit summary for rationale. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:10, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

October 2018 edit

Adding diff; my rationale was: "c/e; npov; unsourced / dubious". --K.e.coffman (talk) 01:39, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

Spurious source given

The source listed as [1] is less than worthless, it is misinformation. This book was propaganda written by the Allies during 1941 to provide their view of what was occurring during 1941, even if "what was happening" really wasn't. References such as the Allied archives, the German archives, and those references written after the war have shown this source to be spurious. The numbers given are, in every instance, several magnitudes lower than German kills claimed. The Luftwaffe was hyper-vigilant when it came to kills claimed; there had to be a witness and then the claim had to be reviewed by the wing commander. I suggest: 1. that this source be stricten from this Wikipedia article and any other Wikipedia articles that contain it, 2. the correct numbers given. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rtmorphine (talk • contribs) 07:41, 18 June 2019 (UTC)