Talk:Jacqueline Hill

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Picture

edit

Has anyone got another picture at all? That one is hideous - or can it at least be lightened?--Tuzapicabit (talk) 13:20, 3 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

edit

This is my very first time posting on Wikipedia, so I apologize for any cluelessness. Two questions: first, is it possible to fix the link to The Shrike? It goes to the film, but Jacqueline Hill wasn't in the film, only the West End production. I'm not sure how to make this right, though.

Also: I wondered about linking this external site: http://jacqueline-hill.com/ - but it's my own site, so I wanted to check with someone more experienced first. Also not sure it's appropriate for a link here, as it's not in any way official. It does, though, have a very tight focus on archive material relating to Jacqueline Hill's career (theatre programmes, articles, obituaries, public domain clips not available elsewhere as far as I know), and I'd like people to be able to find that stuff if they're sufficiently interested in her to come to Wikipedia.

Advice would be welcome, thanks. Swallowdale (talk) 15:02, 15 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jacqueline Hill. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:29, 31 December 2017 (UTC)Reply