Talk:Jacobs School of Music

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Trikekus in topic Copyright problem removed

Untitled edit

Notable faculty members should include current faculty members unless otherwise noted. For example, Gingold was removed because he has long since died, Tozzi because he has retired, and Carment Tellez does not merit a mention as being notable. Perhaps a list of previous notable faculty could be made to allow mention of previous esteemed members.

In response to the above: I just (re-) added Gingold before I saw this note. I would politely disagree with this note's anonymous author, as the article specifically says "past and present," and the roster of illustrious musicians on the faculty is a large part of what made the School of Music such an outstanding educational institution. Josef Gingold is by any measure one of the most important violin teachers in the United States at any period, and his long tenure at IU is something noteworthy. Harvey Phillips is of possibly even greater importance relative to his instrument.
It seems to me that a list of noteworthy past instructors at the SoM is of greater value than a list of current ones, as the latter can be easily looked up at music.indiana.edu (and it is in flux anyway, requiring constant updating to stay current).
Greenpig (talk) 01:21, 7 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Trmac.jpg edit

 

Image:Trmac.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 04:39, 14 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Citing edit

As this article grows, it is necessary that contributors cite their sources when making claims like "the acceptance rate was 12 percent." According to JSoM's website, the acceptance rate for undergraduate students is about 25 percent, and it is about 33 percent for graduate students. If you have doubts about this, please see the FAQ section of JSoM's website, a link to which is posted below.

http://music.indiana.edu/admissions/faq.shtml#Applying

Furthermore, it is inappropriate to start the article with the statement "The Jacobs School of Music is considered to be one of the best music schools in the world." While this would certainly be considered true by most people, it is important that this article remain neutral. Right now, it is overly obvious that editors like "IKnowthegods" are either students of the school, or have some other bias in the favor of JSoM. When editing this article, please keep these things in mind, and know that such biased edits will be undone as is only fair.

Listenstoheart (talk) 14:35, 27 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

NPOV edit

"It is considered one of the best music institutions in the world" is highly unnencyclopedic and should not be on an article. I invite the editors who posted the claims of prestige and greatnest (even when well sourced), to visit the article about other conservatoires such as London's Royal Academy of Music, Juilliard School in NY and Conservatoire de Paris (note how, although also often refered as "prestigious" and "great", their articles don't make claims of greatness and prestige). Please keep in mind that this is an article and not a promotional prospectus/viewbook. Thanks --Karljoos (talk) 22:29, 30 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Prospectus/viewbook or article? edit

This article gives information not relevant for an encyclopedic article. For example: the comprehensive list of the degrees granted and majors, the description of all the choirs, information about admissions. Let’s be serious: this info should not be here (or at least not as it is presented now). Thank you.--Karljoos (talk) 17:50, 19 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

I agree: this is information that can be found on the web site of the School of Music. What's needed is a more detailed history of the school itself. It is absurd that Dean Bain and Dean Webb aren't even mentioned in this article!
Greenpig (talk) 01:32, 7 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Josef Gingold is dead edit

... but is listed under "faculty includes..." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.149.65.67 (talk) 03:56, 20 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Sources edit

There is an entire book on the history of the school prior to its renaming that should probably be used as a source. Cynwolfe (talk) 16:01, 7 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Copyright problem removed edit

  Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Trikekus (:3) 01:40, 28 January 2023 (UTC) Trikekus (:3) 01:40, 28 January 2023 (UTC)Reply