Talk:Jack Shaftoe

Notability

According to "WP:Notability (fiction)," "An element of fiction -- including but not limited to a character, location, object, or aspects of a work's mythos -- is presumed notable if it satisfies the general notability guideline" (emphasis added). The "general notability guideline" then linked to indicates that a subject is notable "if a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." This article on Jack Shaftoe joins other articles on major characters in this award-winning epic, the longest epic of the 21st century thus far and one that has been reviewed (mostly favorably) by hundreds of media outlets. Other articles related to this series include entries for Enoch Root and Eliza. Jack Shaftoe plays a more substantial role than Root in The Baroque Cycle and thus features far more prominently in the hundreds of reviews of the trilogy. By pure page-count Eliza may receive more attention than Shaftoe, but unquestionably Shaftoe, Eliza, and Daniel Waterhouse are the three primary characters in this epic and as such this article should not, as before, be merged with the entry for The Baroque Cycle. Unlike before, the article is now sourced, and if anyone has questions about the article let's improve and not summarily dismantle it. Postscript: It's worth noting, too, that Shaftoe is the named ancestor of three major characters in a separate work of fiction, equally well-received and widely reviewed (Cryptonomicon). This too militates for the entry being kept distinct from the series entry. Burks88 (talk) 22:33, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

Mudlarking as a criminal enterprise in the 17th century...

It was not, despite this article's opening paragraph. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rtelkin (talk • contribs) 05:12, 26 November 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Jack Shaftoe. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100822045952/http://www.powells.com/review/2004_04_23.html to http://www.powells.com/review/2004_04_23.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070223001851/http://www.tcsdaily.com/article.aspx?id=100703A to http://tcsdaily.com/article.aspx?id=100703A

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:43, 20 December 2017 (UTC)