Talk:Jack Nicholson filmography

Latest comment: 6 months ago by Rklawton in topic Ensign Pulver
Featured listJack Nicholson filmography is a featured list, which means it has been identified as one of the best lists produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured list on November 8, 2021.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 23, 2020Featured list candidatePromoted
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on August 10, 2020.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that during his acting career spanning over 60 films, Jack Nicholson received 12 Academy Award nominations, more than any other male actor?

Did you know nomination

edit
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk21:29, 5 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

 
Nicholson in 1976

5x expanded by HAL333 (talk). Self-nominated at 19:50, 6 July 2020 (UTC).Reply

  Fine list with good intro making it a five-times expansion, on plenty of sources, no vcopyvio obvious. - Sorry I don't like the hooks. I dislike the clumsy bolding in the first, and while that is handled elegantly in the ALT, just saying when he retired seems not attractive. - I suggest you combine the strengths of both, perhaps with a different image? - Article: the lead pic should be normal upright, and why no ibox, with the most notable awards at a glance, which kind of get lost in the prose? - I like the table layout, but not of the "none" which gives them extra attention. They could just be left empty, - compare List of operas by Claudio Monteverdi. One more: in opera, when the opera has an article, we don't link the composer also, but mention him or her by last name, such as Beethoven's Fidelio. Sure, people familiar with films will know who directed this or that, but we might serve the others also. What do you think? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:31, 9 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
I guess it may seem a little ironic considering some of my past activities on this platform, but I don't think these kind of lists should have infoboxes. All simplified condensed information are already placed in tables. Placing awards in the IB would draw attention away from the emphasis of this article: films. The only reason I mention them in the lede is to demonstrate the signifcance of his performances. If readers are interested in his awards they can visit the "See Also". I'll try to make those improvements to the article and find a better image.

Here are some alternates:

I appreciate the comments. ~ HAL333 16:47, 11 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
 
Nicholson in 2002
Would this image work better? - HAL333 18:08, 11 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for the offers, - I like both better than the earlier ones, a much better than b. I like the image better, but would like the 1976 (after Oscar nomination) still better. (Why is it 1976 in the image title and 1975 in the caption?) Would you like to try that, or should I approve 1a? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:03, 11 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
The (1975) referred to when the film came out. I just changed it - hopefully it's clear now. Yeah, 1a works and I'm fine with the 1976 image. Thanks! ~ HAL333 20:34, 11 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
  approving ALT1a then. The other image would work better with a hook mentioning it. You decide ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:22, 11 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
I'll go with the 1976 image - it's more pertinent. ~ HAL333 22:45, 11 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
Then please get it over here (formatting obove), and better with a matching ALT2. I forgot to say that the currently presented image (and its crop) is licensed, but with the glasses, doesn't really show much personality. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:54, 12 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
Hopefully I did that correctly. ~ HAL333 14:46, 12 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
Well, partly. You should not have changed what we talked about, but never mind, as we didn't want the image (now not visible) anyway, and I did expect an ALT2 saying some more about the new image, - something I'd actually prefer to this "male actor" wording. But again, if you don't want to think about one, ALT1a (approved) would work - while not elegantly - with the picture of him young, now on top, and licensed, and showing well. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:01, 12 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
Sorry if I've messed this up - I'm not super familiar with the process. ~ HAL333 19:03, 12 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
No mess, - just that someone coming across this nom later would not understand my objections to glasses ;) - - nothing particular to the DYK process: when something has been commented, don't change it. Nothing serious here, - enjoy! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:32, 12 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

1988 How the Rhinoceros Got His Skin & How the Camel Got His Hump does not have a reference. Should it be deleted? Jake-jakubowski (talk) 01:14, 21 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Ensign Pulver

edit

Citation Needed? He's listed as "Dolan" in IMDB, does that count? You can also see his name and photo in the screen credits Rklawton (talk) 05:17, 18 April 2024 (UTC)Reply