edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jack Martins. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:30, 16 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jack Martins. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:18, 19 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Tags

edit

This article has been tagged since 2017, but there has been zero discussion on the talk page. The page was tagged for POV problems and for an alleged conflict of interest. I removed the conflict of interest tag because there was no stated basis for it on the talk page. I have not removed the POV tag. I just cleaned up the article a bit, removing some poorly sourced material and some overly laudatory language. However, the article still leans in a decidedly pro-Martins direction and could use some balance and additional information. SunCrow (talk) 12:25, 22 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

"Relevant discussion may be found on the talk page"

edit

There has been the neutrality disputed tag on this article for five years, but I dont see any relevant discussion that may be found on the talk page. Does anyone object to the removal of this banner, since there is no justification here for why it should still be up? GeorgeBailey (talk) 12:43, 25 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

The article still leans in a decidedly pro-Martins direction and is in desperate need of [[WP:NPOV}} clean-up. BlueboyLINY (talk) 03:56, 31 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
I have cleaned-up the article as best I could, and removed the tag. BlueboyLINY (talk) 05:44, 31 May 2022 (UTC)Reply