Talk:Jack 2

Inclusion of peak oil perspective

It strikes me as a needed counterbalance to the "significant find" claim - especially since the word "significant" does not appear in either source. Ribonucleic 01:42, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

I like how you worded it in this version. Thanks for your help on the article. Ufwuct 16:35, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

The field itself does not have 3-15 billion barrels of oil. It is the region that is estimated to contain 3-15 billion barrels, the Lower Tertiary trend of the deepwater GOM. The Jack field's reserves are probably in the 300 to 600 million barrel range which is still pretty large but definately not 15 billion barrels.

source: Chevron, Devon Energy, and Statoil websites, the owners of the actual oil field. The press, for some dumb reason, has decided to rampantly misquote the fields actual value. I think they do it to disprove the peak oil theory.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jack 2. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110608141846/http://www.chevron.com/chevron/pressreleases/article/09052006_chevronannouncesrecordsettingwelltestatjack.news to http://www.chevron.com/chevron/pressreleases/article/09052006_chevronannouncesrecordsettingwelltestatjack.news

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:30, 16 April 2017 (UTC)