Talk:JUICE (software)
Latest comment: 10 years ago by Chessrat in topic Notability/redirect justified?
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the JUICE (software) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
Notability/redirect justified?
editI came here by a search for JUICE, and was expecting to find the Jupiter Icy Moon Explorer.
This article is in the following categories: Unassessed software articles, Unassessed software articles of Unknown-importance, Unknown-importance software articles, Unassessed Computing articles, and Unknown-importance Computing articles, which IMO is justified and doesn't exactly vouch for its notability, so maybe the article should be renamed to something like JUICE (software) and a redirect pointed to the most notable subject, or a disambiguation page at the very least?
2001:A60:10AE:8201:224:1DFF:FE77:8DF5 (talk) 02:16, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
- Agreed. An article about some obscure software definitely isn't more notable than a spacecraft. I'll implement your suggestions; they don't seem controversial. Chessrat (talk) 17:11, 12 October 2014 (UTC)