Talk:JDM Roitelet

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Klbrain in topic Merge Avions JDM to JDM Roitelet
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on JDM Roitelet. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:04, 26 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Merge Avions JDM to JDM Roitelet

edit

Avions JDM, the manufacturer, appears to have only worked upon one sole aircraft, the JDM Roitelet, as well as only had a brief existence. Aside from a single prototype, it does not appear to have engaged in any other manufacturing effort or significant business activity. The manufacturer, unlike the aircraft, is not plausibly going to progress beyond a single line; instead of repeating the aircraft article's information, I propose that it simply be merged together. Kyteto (talk) 22:22, 1 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

    Y Merger complete. Klbrain (talk) 11:35, 24 April 2021 (UTC)Reply