This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lithuania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lithuania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LithuaniaWikipedia:WikiProject LithuaniaTemplate:WikiProject LithuaniaLithuania articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The actual sortable table designed by Renata3 is excellent. It provides all available figures from the Report. The only problem – and I mean – serious deficiency, are the names of locations which are NOT from the Report, therefore they can neither be compared with a photocopy of the original text, nor quoted in their original form. The approach to locations (as of now) constitutes an example of ahistoricism in our coverage of the Holocaust. We do have the tools to improve on it. For example, the redirect pipes should be used instead of the 21st century toponyms in quoting place-names used by Jäger in his Report: Dünaburg instead of Daugavpils, Novo-Wilejka instead of Naujoji Vilnia, and so on, per the source which is being quoted here. Thank you, Poeticbenttalk 16:48, 21 November 2017 (UTC)Reply
