![]() | Italian ironclad Messina has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: March 3, 2016. (Reviewed version). |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Italian ironclad Messina/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Zawed (talk · contribs) 04:55, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
I will do this one as well. Zawed (talk) 04:55, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Lead
- Repeated use of "...she was..."
- Fixed, as in the other article.
Design/Infobox
- Short/Long tons conversion missing in the infobox for normal displacement.
- It's there
- The link to propulsion is referred to as plural in the infobox but ship only has one engine.
- Fixed
- Inconsistency in number of boilers.
- Fixed
Service history
- "Principe di Carignano member of her class..." > "Her sister ship Principe di Carignano was the only member of her class"?
- Fixed
- "Italia-classs" > "Italia-classes"?
- You'd have thought I'd have caught that when I was writing the articles.
References
- Sondhaus (2001) not used. Also, this means no need for (1994) to differentiate the two Sondhaus refs.
- Good point.
Although short, this article reads well, is fully cited and neutral in tone. Despite its brevity, it has reasonable coverage of the subject which had a limited career. The tags on the images appear appropriate. I will check back on progress in a few days. Cheers. Zawed (talk) 05:06, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
- Changes look good, passing as GA. Cheers. Zawed (talk) 05:33, 3 March 2016 (UTC)