Talk:Italian cruiser Pietro Micca
 | Italian cruiser Pietro Micca has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||
 | Italian cruiser Pietro Micca is part of the Torpedo cruisers of Italy series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
| Current status: Good article | |||||||||||||
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg)
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Italian cruiser Pietro Micca/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Wilhelmina Will (talk · contribs) 18:48, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
The article complies with MOS policies on grammar/wording, as well as general layout/structure. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 19:00, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
- (a) the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct
- (b) it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation
The article cites several reputable publications. There are no signs of original research. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 18:59, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
- (a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline
- (b) reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose)
- (c) it contains no original research
The article seems to cover all relevant information for which reliable sourcing could be found. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 18:58, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
- (a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic
- (b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style)
The article maintains a neutral approach to its topic. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 18:57, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Since its creation back in June this year, the article has not been subjected to any edit warring or similarly disruptive editing. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 18:52, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
On this part, passed as non-applicable at present. Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 18:49, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
- (a) media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content
- (b) media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions
The article satisfies the GA criteria. Congratulations! Herein dwells the greatest dictionary ever composed! (talk) 19:01, 2 August 2016 (UTC)