Talk:It's Elementary: Talking About Gay Issues in School/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: RunningTiger123 (talk · contribs) 03:48, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

I'll be back in a little while with my comments after reading the article and its sources. RunningTiger123 (talk) 03:48, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

Comments:

• 1a
  • There are four sentences that I found use ... and it .... These sentences should either be split (with the and deleted), or a comma should be added before and to make a proper compound sentence.
  • The list New York, Madison, Wisconsin, Cambridge, Massachusetts, and San Francisco should use semicolons to separate the locations, i.e. New York; Madison, Wisconsin; Cambridge, Massachusetts; and San Francisco. This distinguishes the commas that simply divide cities and states.
  • Wikilink New York for consistency, and wikilink American Family Association at its first occurrence instead of its second.
• 2a
  • Use a consistent author naming style in citations: First Last or Last, First, but not a mix. (I personally prefer the latter.)
• 2b
  • Quote in second paragraph of Summary and background is from an unclear source; readers won't immediately know if it's from source 5 or 6.
• Other comments: As a film, a link to the relevant IMDb page under an External links section might be helpful for readers.

Overall, a really good article! RunningTiger123 (talk) 04:36, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

RunningTiger123 I fixed the issues, but I used First Last for the references. SL93 (talk) 04:59, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

No worries about that – consistency is the key thing. RunningTiger123 (talk) 14:47, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

Changes are all good; passing shortly. RunningTiger123 (talk) 14:47, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.