Talk:Isotopes of lawrencium/Archive 1
Latest comment: 7 years ago by Double sharp in topic Data 2003
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
Data 2003
This article is part of Wikipedia:Wikiproject Isotopes. Please keep style and phrasings consistent across the set of pages. For later reference and improved reliability, data from all considered multiple sources is collected here. References are denoted by these letters:
- (A) G. Audi, O. Bersillon, J. Blachot, A.H. Wapstra. The Nubase2003 evaluation of nuclear and decay properties, Nuc. Phys. A 729, pp. 3-128 (2003). — Where this source indicates a speculative value, the # mark is also applied to values with weak assignment arguments from other sources, if grouped together. An asterisk after the A means that a comment of some importance may be available in the original.
- (B) National Nuclear Data Center, Brookhaven National Laboratory, information extracted from the NuDat 2.1 database. (Retrieved Sept. 2005, from the code of the popup boxes).
- (C) David R. Lide (ed.), Norman E. Holden in CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 85th Edition, online version. CRC Press. Boca Raton, Florida (2005). Section 11, Table of the Isotopes. — The CRC uses rounded numbers with implied uncertainties, where this concurs with the range of another source it is treated as exactly equal in this comparison.
- (D) More specific level data from reference B's Levels and Gammas database.
- (E) Same as B but excitation energy replaced with that from D.
Z N refs symbol half-life spin excitation energy 103 148 A |Lr-251 |150# µs | 103 148 C |Lr-251 |39 min | 103 149 A |Lr-252 |390(90) ms | 103 149 B |Lr-252 |0.36(+11-7) s | 103 149 C |Lr-252 |~0.36 s | 103 150 A |Lr-253 |580(70) ms |(7/2-) 103 150 B |Lr-253 |0.57(+7-6) s | 103 150 C |Lr-253 |1.5 s | 103 150 A |Lr-253m |1.5(3) s |(1/2-) |30(100)# keV 103 150 E |Lr-253m |1.5(+3-2) s | |0+X keV 103 150 D |Lr-253m |0.57(+7-6) s | |0+Y keV 103 150 C |Lr-253m |~0.57 s | 103 151 ABC |Lr-254 |13(3) s | 103 152 A |Lr-255 |22(4) s |7/2-# 103 152 BC |Lr-255 |22(4) s | 103 153 AB |Lr-256 |27(3) s | 103 153 C |Lr-256 |28. s | 103 154 A |Lr-257 |646(25) ms |9/2+# 103 154 B |Lr-257 |0.646(25) s | 103 154 C |Lr-257 |0.65 s |7/2+ 103 155 AB |Lr-258 |4.1(3) s | 103 155 C |Lr-258 |3.9 s | 103 156 A |Lr-259 |6.2(3) s |9/2+# 103 156 B |Lr-259 |6.2(3) s | 103 156 C |Lr-259 |6.1 s | 103 157 AC |Lr-260 |3.0(5) min | 103 157 B |Lr-260 |180(30) s | 103 158 ABC |Lr-261 |39(12) min | 103 159 AB |Lr-262 |~4 h | 103 159 C |Lr-262 |3.6 h | 103 160 AB |Lr-263 |5# h | 103 161 AB |Lr-264 |10# h | 103 162 AB |Lr-265 |10# h | 103 163 AB |Lr-266 |1# h |
Femto 11:43, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
I'd be willing to bet that 266Lr, like the other long-lived odd-odd nuclei (cf. the heavy Db isotopes), does not actually undergo SF; instead it would undergo electron capture to 266No, and that, being even-even, could readily fission. Double sharp (talk) 07:22, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
- Yup! Double sharp (talk) 08:31, 4 December 2016 (UTC)
- I think the possibility of β− decay to 266Rf should also be considered. See [1]. Burzuchius (talk) 16:14, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
- True: 265Lr is expected to be on the line of beta-stability, so 266Lr should probably instead be beta-minus. It's interesting to see from your link that 270Db might actually SF directly instead of undergoing electron capture to form 270Rf, and that 268Db may also have an alpha branch to 264Lr (presumably undetected due to its amazingly long half-life). Double sharp (talk) 13:23, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
- I think the possibility of β− decay to 266Rf should also be considered. See [1]. Burzuchius (talk) 16:14, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
