This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dinosaurs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of dinosaurs and dinosaur-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DinosaursWikipedia:WikiProject DinosaursTemplate:WikiProject Dinosaursdinosaurs articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Latest comment: 8 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
I know talk pages are for discussing how to improve the articles, but in this case I think it warrants a mention that the "official" skeletal restoration included in the published paper unquestionably (though uncredited) uses Nobu Tamura's Wikipedia restoration of Montanoceratops as a silhouette (the version where I've removed the incorrect horn from), and then our current life restoration is therefore unwittingly based on another Wikipedia image... Life imitates Wikipedia, and back again! FunkMonk (talk) 20:22, 1 January 2016 (UTC)Reply
Yes I noticed that. But wouldn't the paper need to credit Nobu Tamura as the author of the illustration the silhouette is derived from? IJReiddiscuss 05:33, 2 January 2016 (UTC)Reply
Yeah, though I guess it would seem a bit less urgent when silhouettes alone are used... FunkMonk (talk) 17:30, 2 January 2016 (UTC)Reply
