Talk:Isabel Guzman

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Buidhe in topic Requested move

Name

edit
@KidAd: Therequiembellishere (talk) 04:35, 8 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Requested move

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved (non-admin closure) (t · c) buidhe 04:14, 16 January 2021 (UTC)Reply




Isabel Casillas GuzmanIsabel Guzman – Overwhelmingly known as "Isabel Guzman" and not the current title at an astonishing current rate of 506,000 to 48. Therequiembellishere (talk) 21:43, 8 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

  • Oppose She is not a politician. If the page is moved, it should be moved to “Isabel C. Guzman” or simply “Isabel Guzman”. But I oppose any move until reliable sources indicate whether “Casillas” is her middle name, maiden name or other. KidAd talk 22:06, 8 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
It's literally irrelevant to whether or not it should be the title, it's not how she goes by professionally. Suggest another way to disambiguate, but this long-form flatly fails WP:COMMONNAME. Therequiembellishere (talk) 23:18, 8 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
I suggested "Isabel C. Guzman." Feel free to boldly move the page to that title if it doesn't offend you. But assigning "(politician)" to someone who has never held or run for elected office doesn't seem like a good solution at all. KidAd talk 23:33, 8 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
This is not true. She does not use her full name nor does the California office she works for. 2600:1700:3777:40C0:41A9:8459:CED1:B3B3 (talk) 23:35, 9 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
Agree, Isabel Guzman would be best as the COMMONNAME, I'd thought it need a disambig for some reason. Therequiembellishere (talk) 21:23, 9 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
Revised move request Therequiembellishere (talk) 21:25, 9 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.