Talk:Isabel Ashdown
 | A fact from Isabel Ashdown appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 14 February 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
Reference format edit
This article uses the List-defined references format for reference citations. This means that the details of all references are provided at the end, and citations in the body of the text are provided in the form of a named reference, such as:
<ref name="Ref Name" />
This reduces the obtrusion of citation metadata into the body of the wiki-text, and makes the article easier to edit.
Please retain this reference format for consistency, unless a consensus to change it is developed on this talk page. DES (talk) 17:21, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
Plot? edit
Why does a biography have a plot section?
jw —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.237.243.165 (talk) 03:39, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
References edit
In this edit back in 2011, all references were removed by Bookybook100 and apparently no one has noticed or cared that this BLP has been totally without inline citations for several years now. I propose to restore them asap. DES (talk) 20:22, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
Critical response section edit
While technically the content of this section is responses from critics, they are all carefully chosen positive quotes of exactly the sort that one would expect to see printed on the cover of a book to promote it. It's possibly not as neutral as what I would expect to see in a critical response section. I've tagged the article with a potential COI issue as a significant proportion of the editing on it has been by Bookybook100 whose contributions to WP have all (with one exception) been edits to this article (the exception being an edit to the University of Brighton article adding Isabel Ashdown to the list of notable alumni, staff and associates). danno_uk 15:28, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
- Agreed It looks to me like a list of promotional spam so I will remove it.SovalValtos (talk) 03:50, 4 September 2018 (UTC)