Talk:Irreligion in the United Kingdom
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Irreligion in the United Kingdom article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2038 edit
Predictions for 2038 seem to ignore the Wikipedia rule referring to a crystal ball. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.154.23.47 (talk) 12:46, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
Nick Clegg edit
Nick Clegg has stated in interview that he is not an atheist:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3058391/Nick-Clegg-reveals-not-atheist.html
The statement was also not sourced, but now debunked anyway, so I have removed it. Bertcocaine (talk) 04:12, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
Anglicanism is crucial edit
You claim that all Christians, even those who don't give a damn about the Monarch are one. Lies are distorted statistics. If all Christians were one, they would merge their Churches. Your filth has an opposite impact on Christianity. When you merge various stuff, you don't merely get complex statistics, but chemical reactions and decay!
Pure Dawkinsism edit
You merge all nonreligious people under one tag. Conscious atheists have nothing to do with religiously indifferent. Absolutely nothing. When you merely sit on your desk, pseudothinking with your negligible mind, Atheism seems as a form of religious indifference. I have spoken to Anglo-Polish conscious atheists and to Anglo-Shqip religious indifferent. They are day and night (here the idiom doesn't mean continuous, instead different, because day and night exhibit illuminant difference)! You merge them merely because they are enemies of Christianity, also Richard Dawkins wants to win the battle against religion, at any cost, even if people become merely indifferent towards it. I kept notes about things atheists and religiously indifferent said! It's like claiming that Hindus and Christians are Hindochristians merely because a. they believe in stories and b. are good people. I suggest you make a new group, called "people" so you can get the so desirable 100%, then you can call yourself a statistician, and proudly go fart in a corner.