Talk:Irreligion in Mexico

Synthesis

This article reads like a student's dissertation and is full of synthesis and original research. Furthermore, most of that "religion and politics" is irrelevant to "irreligion". The Red Hat of Pat Ferrick ^t 18:49, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Irreligion in Mexico. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120318225631/http://tarlton.law.utexas.edu/constitutions/text/1824index.html to http://tarlton.law.utexas.edu/constitutions/text/1824index.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070303014932/http://www.ilstu.edu/class/hist263/docs/1917const.html to http://www.ilstu.edu/class/hist263/docs/1917const.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:33, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Irreligion in Mexico. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110604185226/http://ateismodesdemexico.org/ to http://ateismodesdemexico.org/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:57, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

not the same: to atheism or anti-clericalism

1. To fight against the power of some humans.
2. To fight against the belief that:
   1. A bearer of personhood is precosmic and cosmogonic.
   2. Personhood is superior than physics, controls everything and dictates personocratic goals to everything.

These are different ideas, but many people mix them; usually because they are personocrats (believers that personhood is the sole criterion; the rightists as cosmological personocrats, and the leftists as hominocrats with more individual rights [but a biological person / human is a hyponym of the term person]).

Politically motivated historians sometimes distort the ideas of the past, in order they are presented to be more philosophical than practical. That is good and bad. Bad because that's not history. Good because each society has different values thus it uses the past as a means to present the new values as traditional. Some lay-people value only tradition, thus presenting the analytical atheism, the cosmologically non-personocratic atheism as traditional, boosts the possibility of its acceptance (better chances).

These distortions are old, thus themselves certainly are historical (yes, history is complicated). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:2149:828A:AC00:618E:99C7:F7FE:C82F (talk) 09:21, 17 November 2019 (UTC)