Talk:Irenicism

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by theology work group (assessed as Mid-importance).

Theology

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Theology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Theology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TheologyWikipedia:WikiProject TheologyTemplate:WikiProject TheologyTheology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

[Untitled] edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

There's also an article at Irenicism that seems to have similar content. Which is the right word? Are they both acceptable? Should they be merged? Or should there just be a redirect?131.215.172.17 (talk) 05:30, 6 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

According to most of the dictionaries I have looked at the word is spelled "irenicism" (especially the Oxford American Dictionary), so I have changed the spelling in the article. It can be changed back if more disagree with this spelling. I just wanted to be correct with what a lot of dictionaries have since that spelling might be more common to people because of that. Could someone change the article title to reflect the new spelling? Beaver72.171.0.148 (talk) 17:53, 18 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Merge Proposal edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

As the IP above suggested, it to me looks like these two articles should be merged. Commentary? GRBerry 01:08, 17 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Yes, merge them. (anonymous guy passing through.) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.212.32.215 (talk) 19:43, 16 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Add topic