Talk:Iranian intervention in the Syrian civil war

Latest comment: 5 years ago by Nihlus1 in topic gatestone institute as a source for strength

Correct casualty rate edit

Casualties as per 2018: -549 Iranians -878 Afghans -116 Iraqis -112 Pakistanis

https://twitter.com/Alfoneh/status/984077389318717441

RedSparrow1 (talk) 21:41, 21 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Those are only documented casualties as stated by Alfoneh himself. Other sources put the numbers at around 2,100 Iranians [1] and 2,000 Afghans [2]. EkoGraf (talk) 23:19, 22 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

You need to read the orginal article BBC on which those secondary sources have based their reporting carefully. They refer to defenders of the shrine, i.e. non-Iranian Shia militias.


https://www.middleeasteye.net/columns/hundreds-iranians-have-been-killed-syria-why-does-tehran-fight-376313881

Julius IX (talk) 01:00, 7 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Move discussion in progress edit

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Russia's role in the Syrian Civil War which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 14:30, 28 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned references in Iranian involvement in the Syrian Civil War edit

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Iranian involvement in the Syrian Civil War's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "businessinsider.com":

Reference named "plot":

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 13:37, 27 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned references in Iranian involvement in the Syrian Civil War edit

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Iranian involvement in the Syrian Civil War's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "CNN":

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 08:18, 2 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Iranian's reasons for involvement in the Syrian Civil War edit

It is better to add a section in the article as reasons of Iran in the Syrian Civil War. In this section, we must explain this reasons clearly.Saff V. (talk) 08:46, 12 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Involvement or support? edit

Iran is clearly taking part in the war, but i would like to ask whether its main role is supporting the Baath Government or it is in fact actively involved? I have the impression that sending logistic, financial and advisory aid warrants for support. Involvement of a limited number of volunteers and intelligence also doesn't imply active Iranian involvement. Thoughts? Sources?GreyShark (dibra) 17:17, 31 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

The artcle now lists three sources indicating direct Iranian military casualties in the war. IMHO that's clearly "involvement" to me. Orenwolf (talk) 16:00, 7 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Iranian involvement in the Syrian Civil War. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:40, 14 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

gatestone institute as a source for strength edit

Wikaviani I have removed two sources which are from this institute that has been reporting "false news" and known for being "Anti-Muslim" per its article in Wikipedia if you have any objection discuss it here. Thanks--SharabSalam (talk) 02:24, 15 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Nihlus1 Please help. I couldnt find in the fourth paragraph the source that says there are ~70,000 Iranian and pro-Iran foreign nationals fighting in Syria and I also couldnt find the source for the 15,000+ Iranian in Syrian could you provide the sources here? Please note that this article is under active community sanctions.Thanks--SharabSalam (talk) 02:40, 15 March 2019 (UTC)Reply
Sorry, it was the fifth paragraph. As the article text notes the estimates were from Gatestone.--Nihlus1 (talk) 02:56, 15 March 2019 (UTC)Reply
@Nihlus1: Which is? unreliable source!!!!!. Are you actually talking for real or you didnt notice? I have removed that source because of that issue it is unreliable and now you say that the source is what I have removed? please explain this!--SharabSalam (talk) 03:43, 15 March 2019 (UTC)Reply
@SharabSalam: Actually, I found a better source. As I posted in the current article, an Iranian brigadier general publicly announced in August 2017 that 25% of the soldiers that Iran had sent to Syria were killed or injured. In March 2017, the head of Iran’s veterans’ affairs office released some figures showing that over 2,100 Iranian soldiers were killed in Syria. The Aawswat article, which claims to be quoting official Iranian data (again, I haven't seen the original statement, I'm dependent on English-language sources reporting it), also says that these figures included "over 7,000" wounded on top of the 2,100 dead. Taken together, this would be some 9,100 Iranians killed or wounded, who per the general's words account for 25% of the total who were sent; therefore their total strength, up to mid-2017, should have been around 36,000.--Nihlus1 (talk) 08:53, 17 March 2019 (UTC)Reply