Talk:Ioan C. Filitti/GA1

Latest comment: 12 years ago by Dr. Blofeld in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Dr. Blofeld (talk · contribs) 09:54, 13 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

References

Surname before first name in all sources all that's needed here.♦ Dr. Blofeld 09:54, 13 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

  Done. TAP 15:37, 13 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

And the inline citations names too.♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:25, 13 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:  
    B. MoS compliance:  
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:  
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:  
    C. No original research:  
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    B. Focused:  
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
The infobox image is arguably public domain now.♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:40, 14 June 2012 (UTC)Reply
  1. B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:  
  2. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:  

Easily meets GA criteria and with a bit of work has FA potential. It could do with a few more images though..♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:35, 14 June 2012 (UTC)Reply