Talk:Invitational rhetoric

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 5 December 2017 by reviewer RileyBugz (talk · contribs).

Feminism Low‑importance

	Feminism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Feminism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Feminism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FeminismWikipedia:WikiProject FeminismTemplate:WikiProject FeminismFeminism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Philosophy Low‑importance

	Philosophy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Writing Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Writing, a WikiProject interested in improving Wikipedia's coverage of content related to the fields of rhetoric, composition, technical communication, literacy, and language studies.WritingWikipedia:WikiProject WritingTemplate:WikiProject WritingWriting articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education assignment: Communication Theory and Frameworks

Latest comment: 12 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This article is currently the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 3 September 2024 and 9 December 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Peer reviewers: Zhidong Sun.

— Assignment last updated by Operator3476 (talk) 23:15, 24 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Peer Review

Latest comment: 9 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello, everyone. I am a student from Georgetown University. This is a fascinating theory with strong practical relevance in today’s world.

Firstly, regarding the lead section of the article, I believe it meets the standards of an excellent Wikipedia entry by providing "a lead section that is easy to understand." The introduction offers a clear overview of the theory, covering core concepts and purpose, aiming to inform rather than persuade. Additionally, the lead reflects essential principles of invitational rhetoric, such as equality, inherent value, and self-determination. While it gives a balanced overview, expanding on the applications or critiques of the theory could provide a more rounded introduction.

Overall, the article is well-structured. After the lead, it delves into the theory’s core elements, rhetorical options, applications, and critiques, allowing readers to gradually deepen their understanding of each key aspect without diverging from the main topic.

The article maintains a neutral, balanced approach by introducing the theory’s key concepts, applications, and some controversies without leaning too positively or negatively, thereby avoiding any push towards a specific conclusion.

I personally see two areas for potential improvement. Firstly, the "applications" section is somewhat brief, merely listing references without explanations or summaries. This may make it challenging for beginners to locate and review each source individually. Perhaps categorizing, summarizing, and annotating these references could improve readability. I also found two recent references that could supplement this section:

Alexander, B. K., & Hammers, M. (2019). An invitation to rhetoric: A generative dialogue on performance, possibility, and feminist potentialities in invitational rhetoric. Cultural Studies↔ Critical Methodologies, 19(1), 5-14.

Pariera, K. L., & Turner, J. W. (2020). Invitational Rhetoric between Parents and Adolescents: Strategies for Successful Communication. Journal of Family Communication, 20(2), 175–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/15267431.2020.1729157

Secondly, incorporating visual elements like a mind map of the theory might aid readers, especially those unfamiliar with the theory, in better understanding it.

Overall, I have learned a great deal about this theory from this page, and I appreciate the efforts and contributions of everyone involved in creating it. Zhidong Sun (talk) 23:34, 27 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic