![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is written in Hiberno-English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, travelled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
Requested move
edit- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: page moved as a technical request. -- JHunterJ (talk) 11:19, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Inverin → Inverin – An editor with very little Wikipedia history moved the page from Inverin to Wikipedia:Indreabhán. When I moved it back I didn't notice that "Wikipedia" was included in the title as part of the reversion. Now I cannot move the page from Wikipedia:Inverin to Inverin. The page has also somehow been disconnected from its talk page and it needs to be reunited with it. Thanks. — O'Dea (talk) 23:07, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
- Support - but in all honesty this looks like a technical move. Unless anyone else objects very quickly you might want to derequest and rerequest as a technical move. In ictu oculi (talk) 01:37, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
- Hmm, on second thoughts maybe it isn't. But either way, you might want to simply contact an admin to fix this. In ictu oculi (talk) 05:28, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Indreabhán/Inverin
edit- Indreabhán is the official name of this village and the only name that appears on the road signs. Why is this antiquated anglicisation being given precedence over the village's actual name? Even in English Indreabhán is referred to as Indreabhán. --Ancatmara (talk) 14:18, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
- I agree fully with this. 79.97.64.240 (talk) 11:27, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
When is this article going to be renamed to reflect official naming, and common usage here in Ireland. There appears to be resistance by some in Wikipedia to prevent the article names reflecting the actual situation in Ireland. It is boring to have to keep reminding these self appointed defenders of imperial English usage that things have changed and that Calcutta, Peking, Inverin etc. are no longer acceptable outside of a history section. Indeed, whatever about the usage of the first two examples above I can safely say there is no danger of confusion in renaming the article but there is in leaving it as is. Taibhdhearc (talk) 20:35, 5 January 2017 (UTC)
- Article uses English name rather than the Irish one because this is English Wikipedia, in accordance with WP:IMOS policy. — O'Dea (talk) 23:56, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Inverin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121025063155/http://buseireann.ie/pdf/1277300272-424.pdf to http://www.buseireann.ie/pdf/1277300272-424.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:52, 15 November 2017 (UTC)