Talk:Intrauterine growth restriction

Untitled

Peer Review For Author Jzussman: Edits made by this user are excellent and have incorporated more appropriate medical terminology, with active wikilink where appropriate. Updated portions read extremely well, and at a first pass, all citations are to valid credible tertiary or secondary sources. I did not catch any typos or grammatical errors, or excessively wordy sentences. Only wordy portions are those using wikilinks, which by necessity repeat medical terminology. I do not believe revision is necessary here because despite wordiness at first read, wikilinks add to the accessibility and understanding of this medical terminology to the average reader. Only suggestion for improvement that I can think of is to re-read this passage and consider replacement of medical jargon that is not wikilinked with wikilinks or more common language - however edits are very well written and this is merely a suggestion. Great work. Db156 (talk) 22:16, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

Peer Review Edits made to the section on atypical types of IGUR were excellent and very informative. All citations made were valid. One recommendation would be to incorporate more citations within the text; some of the statements do not appear to have any citations. Rho r11n (talk) 03:32, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

Peer Review for author Geryvel: Edits made by the author to the management section of the IGUR page are helpful and appropriate. The author did a great job including valid citations from credible sources. The section reads well and clearly lays out the pros and cons of various monitoring modalities. Furthermore, for more esoteric management options, the author includes relevant background information. One recommendation would be to double-check grammar and wikilink medical terminology (e.g. parturition). Great work! Jmaru24 (talk) 05:41, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

Editing workplan:

Mon 8/30 Assignment Day 1 reviewed Wikiproject Medicine’s website decided what team will work on which article begun designing a viable workplan strategy for our team

Fri 9/3 completed all 9 required Wiki Ed training modules posted our team workplan to the wikipage we’re going to improve

Fri 9/10 made our first edits live on Wikipedia (rather than merely in sandboxes)

Mon 9/13 Wiki Inquiry SG #2 Works in progress presentation for small group

Sun 9/12 begun peer-review

Sun 9/19 completed peer-review and posted it on the talk page of the one we’re peer-reviewing

Mon 9/20 Wiki Inquiry SG #2 Have all changes implemented into live wikipedia article

after assignment is complete intermittently check up on “our wiki page” to see if there have been additional improvements improve other areas of Wikipedia’s health content

Aspect of workplan

Intrauterine Growth Restriction Start-Class Quality article in need of additions Mild Importance

You WP editing team (up to 3) Jzussman, Geryvel

Initial Analysis of the article Sparse, poorly written, tangential information

Overall organization, what changes We want to overhaul the Management and Outcomes sections of this article and add small changes elsewhere (particularly in the Classification section) as we find other info

What will you add? more specific and accurate information in the Management and Outcomes sections as well as the sidebar

What will you remove? Non-specific image of villitis of unknown etiology, there are likely more representative images

What will you augment? the Management and Outcomes sections

What will you decrease coverage of? Nothing

Roles in the project. List members and planned roles.

Geryvel: Management Overseer/amalgamator/reconciler Readability editor Researcher Editor/writer-what sections will each do? Images/graphics

Jzussman: Outcomes Overseer/amalgamator/reconciler Readability editor Researcher Editor/writer-what sections will each do? Images/graphics

Team coordination plan: Meet at assigned CIC small group times, coordinate via slack in between

WIP presenter Each cover own sections

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 30 August 2021 and 21 September 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Geryvel, Jzussman, Macrophage3. Peer reviewers: Jmaru24, Db156, Rho r11n.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 00:44, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Scope

I am cleaning up this article. It has been redirected to several different pages, but these redirects are not accurate. IUGR is not the same thing as SGA; likewise, it is an intrauterine condition and should not be redirected to birth mass. jsfouche (talk) 16:49, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

The article does not actully say what IUGR actualy is... Article should begin with a definition, but instead defines SGR. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.109.88.222 (talk) 17:40, 28 May 2011 (UTC)

Literature missing in-line citations

I had to move the following literature to here, because it is missing wp:in-line citations to avail for wp:verifiability. Please link references specifically to every claim in the article when reinserting these, or using new references. Mikael Häggström (talk) 08:12, 24 September 2011 (UTC)