Talk:Intralaminar thalamic nuclei

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Mellohi! in topic Requested move 13 June 2022

Graph and Text

edit

Sorry, could it be that the figure does not match the text? In the graph I don't see the nuclei mentioned in the text, and vice versa. Also, in the figure it should probably be "interthalamic adhesion", not "intrathalmic adhesion", so I wonder how reliable the figure is. Strasburger (talk) 16:43, 19 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 13 June 2022

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. Nominator has shown that the suggested name is the common name. (closed by non-admin page mover)Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 20:34, 22 June 2022 (UTC)Reply


Intralaminar nuclei of thalamusIntralaminar thalamic nuclei – In article lead already and by far the most common name since 2000: Google Ngrams Facts707 (talk) 09:55, 13 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

According to Terminologia Anatomica, the official term describing this structure is "intralaminar nuclei of thalamus". --Athikhun.suw (talk) 07:11, 18 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.