Talk:Interstate 805/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Dough4872 00:49, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

---

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   The route description contains several consecutive sentences that begin with "It then continues" or "It then meets".

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   Most of the history needs to be referenced.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   The route description and history could use some more details. The history appears to be missing some information.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

From looking at the article, although fairly decent, it appears to need more information and more references in order for it to be considered a GA. Therefore, I will have to fail it for now. Once more references and information can be added, the article can be renominated. Dough4872 00:49, 3 May 2010 (UTC)