Talk:Interstate 790

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

North South arterial edit

Does anyone think the North South Arterial should be its own article? If I link to it in an article it would link to the disambiguation page, and I'm not sure if that's what is needed. Buffaboy talk 02:39, 19 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

@Buffaboy: you have two different issues you're discussing there. Regarding the first, I don't think that we should split out a separate article. We'd still need an article on I-790, and there'd be too much overlap between the separate articles on what is a highway that's a little over two miles long. As for the second, North–South Arterial Highway already links here. What are you trying to link? Imzadi 1979  06:06, 19 June 2015 (UTC)Reply
@Imzadi1979: In Utica the Arterial extends further south than the I-790 southern terminus, so there is a bit of an information gap between the NY 5, NY 8 and NY 12 articles. The disambiguation article links to these different sections, but it doesn't seem very cohesive to me. I hope I explained it well. Buffaboy talk 17:02, 19 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Interstate 790. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:08, 12 April 2017 (UTC)Reply