Talk:Interstate 73 in North Carolina

U.S. Roads: Interstates / North Carolina C‑class Mid‑importance

	U.S. roads portal This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Topics	Interstate Highways
Locations	North Carolina
	This article has a map. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.
	This article has a junction list compliant with the Manual of Style on road junction lists.
	This article has a KML file. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.

United States: North Carolina Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	North Carolina portal This article is supported by WikiProject North Carolina (assessed as Low-importance).

Text and/or other creative content from this version of Interstate 73 was copied or moved into Interstate 73 in North Carolina with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Merge

Latest comment: 3 years ago8 comments7 people in discussion

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result of this discussion was to not merge the articles. WashuOtaku (talk) 03:41, 5 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

I don't think I-73 will ever be finished. All info is already in parent article, as such I think we should merge as I-73 is only Start class although this is only C class. --Hurricane Tracker 495 20:51, 25 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Oppose—I'd just leave it as in since there are other state-level subarticles for other states, thus it's not all here. Imzadi 1979 → 21:13, 25 December 2020 (UTC)Reply
Oppose - I-73 is planned to pass through multiple states and has multiple state-detail articles for the existing/planned segments in North Carolina and the planned segments in other states. Therefore, it would be too much to merge into one article. Dough4872 22:26, 25 December 2020 (UTC)Reply
Comment please don't use the I-73 will pass thru other states reason as it likely won't be built. --Hurricane Tracker 495 22:44, 25 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Support without prejudice to re-splitting in the future. I would rather we maintain one page now and then split out S-D articles in the distant future. –Fredddie ™ 22:48, 25 December 2020 (UTC)Reply
As a procedural note, the initiator of this discussion has been blocked as a sockpuppet. But regardless I would say oppose because not only do these subarticles exist, but they already have a significant amount of text. --Rs chen 7754 07:51, 26 December 2020 (UTC)Reply
Oppose. Not sure if we are still discussing this, I just came across it. I get the argument, however, I do think it's more likely than not that South Carolina will build its section and I do think Virginia may eventually complete the Interstate to Roanoke. So I think a state article in NC, SC, and VA at least is warranted. I also feel like keeping the NC section in the main article is quite broad when officially the highway will run from Myrtle Beach to Michigan and there is no certainty that the highway will never be built. That is just my preference I guess.--Ncchild (talk) 01:56, 5 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Add topic